|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
The Jurisprudential Criticism of Imam Al-Izz Bin Abd Al-Salam in His Book “The Rules of Judgments in the Interests of the People” |
|
|
|
PP: 3059-3067 |
|
|
|
doi:10.18576/isl/120732
|
|
|
|
Author(s) |
|
|
|
Laith M. Al-Azab,
Samir A. Al-Harasis,
Alaa F. Al-Borini,
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
| Imam al-Izz ibn Abd al-Salam had a place at the top of the pyramid of jurisprudence in general and al-Shafi’i in particular. Senior jurists are of that rank, and the nation is unanimous in their acceptance and acceptance of their jurisprudential product, which cannot be separated from it and that heritage for the sake of renewal or to keep pace with the other. I am talking here about the men of the four recognized schools of jurisprudence. Among those sects was the Shafi’i school of thought, and this study came to shed light on the jurisprudential criticism that the imam dealt with in his well-known and famous book: “The Rules of Judgments in the Interests of People.” This is the jurisprudential criticism that he not only directed to the great jurists of different sects, but also extended his criticism to the jurisprudence school that he adopts and adopts, which is the Shafi’i school. And when those scattered jurisprudential criticisms abounded in this useful book - which I made the focus of research -, and those criticisms were direct and direct to the adherents of the sects from an imam who is attested by everyone who has consideration in the sciences of jurisprudence and its origins, we can through all of this deduce the importance of analyzing and discussing some of them possible in this study. It was through the descriptive inductive method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
