|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Banks and the Influence of Paternalistic Leadership on Employee Job Performance |
|
|
|
PP: 135-150 |
|
|
|
doi:10.18576/jsap/140201
|
|
|
|
Author(s) |
|
|
|
Mohamed Hafez,
Fisal Al-Showeikh,
Betty Wan Niu Voon,
Hussein Al-Faiz,
Shawkat Alkhazaleh,
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
| This study examines the impact of paternal leadership on job performance, where paternal leadership is defined through three dimensions: benevolent leadership, animal leadership, and authoritarian leadership. Job performance is assessed using a series of descriptive phrases. A descriptive analytical approach was employed, utilizing a questionnaire distributed to employees in commercial banks. A stratified random sampling method was applied to ensure a comprehensive and current representation of the study population, which consists of a diverse group of bank employees. The findings indicate significant variances in employee perceptions regarding ethical leadership and benevolent leadership within private commercial banks. Furthermore, the study reveals that ethical leadership has a notable positive effect on job performance, whereas both benevolent and authoritarian leadership do not show significant impacts on job performance. Additionally, there are marked differences in employee opinions regarding paternalistic leadership and job performance. Based on these findings, the study recommends enhancing oversight of administrative leadership at all levels, promoting ethical behavior among employees, and advocating for accountability in human resources practices such as recruitment and selection. It also emphasizes the need for improved training programs and the establishment of clear legal regulations for banks, along with fostering open communication between upper management and staff beyond formal interactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
