|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Cyberterrorism: a New Form of Terror, a Misunderstood Crime or a Free-Pass for Privacy Invasion? Morocco as a Case of Study |
|
|
|
PP: 111-117 |
|
|
|
Author(s) |
|
|
|
Nada Naji,
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
| The phenomenon of cyberterrorism remains a contentious topic among scholars, with ongoing debates regarding its very existence. Questions arise as to whether cyberterrorism constitutes a distinct crime or if it is merely an exaggerated and politically manipulated form of cybercrime. This discourse introduces several critical issues, the first being the challenge of defining terrorism itself, a concern that has persisted since the inception of the term. Additionally, there exists a significant distinction between cyberterrorism and cybercrime, necessitating a clear understanding of the boundaries that separate the two. Another pressing inquiry involves evaluating the potential threats posed by cyberterrorism and the ramifications of cyber attacks. Furthermore, the discourse extends to the realm of human rights in the digital landscape, particularly in light of governmental initiatives aimed at enhancing cybersecurity. Numerous scholars have explored these complex questions, including Michael Stohl, who has examined the definitional ambiguities between cyberterrorism and cybercrime , and Gabriel Weimann, who has focused on assessing the threats associated with cyberterrorism . This paper will conduct a case study of the Kingdom of Morocco, analyzing the definitions it employs for terms such as "Terrorism", "cyberterrorism", "cybercrime", and "cybersecurity “. The analysis will delve into the limitations inherent in each definition before evaluating the counter-cyberterrorism measures implemented, assessing their significance, effectiveness, and the potential for unintended consequences stemming from the adopted policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
