|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
The Dialectic between the Use of Force and the Law in International Relations: Managing the Crisis of Activating the Mechanisms of International Humanitarian Law in the Arab- Israeli Conflict Studying the Gaza War 2023 |
|
|
|
PP: 75-91 |
|
|
|
doi:10.18576/wrpsj/060207
|
|
|
|
Author(s) |
|
|
|
Hader Hassan Hassan Dawoud,
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
| This research seeks to study the impact of the rules of the use of force in international relations in
accordance with the rules of international law on the idea of collective security under the policies of
competition and permanent international balances of power in the Security Council and the effectiveness
of their application between the theoretical text and practical reality, applied to the study of the state of
the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the effectiveness of international rules in managing the war crisis in
Gaza 2023, in order to provide an analysis of the texts of the rules of international law and the positions
of the major countries towards the issue of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the study is divided into two
researches, where the first the international law in armed conflicts and the mechanisms of its
application, the second topic is presented The reasons for the outbreak of war, its risks and current
policies to resolve the crisis and impose a truce ،
The study relied mainly on the crisis management methodology to analyze the extent to which the
causes of the outbreak of war are related to the policies of the balance of major powers that it follows in
dealing with issues in the Security Council, the risks of continuing that crisis on collective security, the
positions of major countries in resolving the Gaza war crisis that has erupted since the seventh of last
October, and the extent of their application of the rules of international law in armed conflicts.
This study concluded that the United Nations is at risk of ending its work, like its predecessor, the
league of nations, as a result of the inability of the Security Council due to the policies of its permanent
members double standards in managing crises of armed wars and preventing their outbreak, and
therefore the inability to provide security protection to the community and the groups addressed to it,
which is largely manifested since the outbreak of the conflict historically until the ongoing war, and its
inability to impose a truce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
