|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Correction: Dichotomous Randomised Response Techniques |
|
|
|
PP: 35-48 |
|
|
|
doi:10.18576/jsapl/100103
|
|
|
|
Author(s) |
|
|
|
A. T. Adeniran,
O. M. Akojenu,
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
| This study points out some mistakes in ”Dichotomous Randomised Response Techniques”, introduced by Hussain and Shabbir to estimate proportion of people with a sensitive trait. The same study was reparameterized, re-estimated, extended and cited by various researchers, though in literature no one has pointed out the mistakes. The study adopted same Binomial distribution as sampling model, Maximum Likelihood as estimation procedure, and Percentage Relative Efficiency (PRE) evaluated at varying values of design parameters as model evaluation criterion. In most cases, the PRE of the corrected-dichotomous Randomised Response Distributions (RRD) over the orthodox models are greater than 100, indicating its efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
